All magazines I researched have some kind of house style, meaning the colours and fonts and general layout of pages are similar and continuous in all issues. I made a house for my magazine layout which includes the same font and layout for pages; I used the same layout I would use for all features on my article, but I changed the colour in order for it to compliment the
content. For example, on my article, the colours used are green white and black as they match the image. However, these colours, despite the light green which is feminine due to the article content, are still masculine colours.
My magazine has several similar forms and conventions of real music magazines, such as those I researched. I have used similar ones that tend to make a magazine attractive and popular, such as pugs, main images, gender targeted colours.
I have mainly used very similar forms and conventions on my front cover, for example, a large title, drawing the attention of passer bys.
Underneath the title is a puff, which helps to sell a magazine by emphasising how good it is.
I have got a barcode at the top right corner, which is necessary for the readers when they go to buy the magazine
I have highlighted and changed the colours of important bits in the sub-headlines, called Buzz Words. I feel that this is a bit different to other magazines.
Many magazines have a promotional offer, a special item that they are including with the issue of the magazine for free. Mine is a free CD which is common amongst music magazines, especially in acoustic magazines.
I have a banner across the bottom of the page which includes other artists that are featured in the magazine. This is very similar on front covers, even of different genres. I feel that I have challenged this tool by the placing of images on it.
Although I have used and developed forms and conventions, I have also tried to challenge some. For example, although the main image is in the middle of the page, I have taken it will a real background as opposed to a plain backdrop, such as in this one.

A thing that is similar though is the showing of
the artists’ guitar, as it is partly essential for people to recognise what kind of genre the magazine it is.
Another thing that is similar is the covering of a bit of the masthead (like in the image above). My pug covers the 's', but this is common in well established magazines as they are still recognisable to their target audience and even passerbys.
The title of my magazine, Strings, a one syllable word, could be considered a challenge. Magazines try to create a title that is easy to remember. This can be done by a peculiar title, such as Big Cheese, or by using short, snappy one word syllables. I feel my title is good as it is short, so will stick in peoples mind, but it is also relevant to the content of the magazine, which not many magazines achieve, such as Big Cheese.
On the article and contents page, I have done some things that I feel are a bit different to some other magazines.
I have put borders around many things, which help to make the page neater. I have noticed that many magazines do not do this.
The contents page, I think, is very different to most. It is very simple, whereas most are rather crowded, making them difficult to understand. Also, the colours here are intertwined to the colours on the front page, which would be a continuous things throughout all the issues in my magazine, following the house style.
In my article I have used different colours for the questions asked by the magazine and for questions asked by fans. Not many magazines do this, but I think it is a good idea so people can differentiate easier.
Also, I feel that other Acoustic magazines are aimed at a higher age range, so I chose to target a slightly younger age group. Not only is the acoustic genre then more accessible for many ages, the competition against my magazine could perhaps be reduced.